[MD] It's a trap

[118]

OK, Marsha.  I was just wondering if you had thought through the
metaphysics of your view.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:01 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Sorry, Mark, no answers for you...
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:56 PM, 118 wrote:
>
>> Hi Marsha,
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Are you sure that Dynamic Quality really IS that?  How does one know
>> the unknowable?  How does one create three adjectives for the
>> indivisible?  How does one define the undefinable as your "For me..."
>> states?
>>
>> For static patterns, is the "conditionally" an independent source?
>> How does the concept of processes come into the picture, are processes
>> defined before co-dependent arises?  That is, is there a third
>> component which defines the process?  Is the ever-changing aspect
>> unchanging?  If things are predictable, how does something
>> unpredictable come into the picture (like the Black Swan)?
>>
>> How does the Flow of static patterns manifest?  Is there flow and then
>> Self, or is there Self and then flow?  Do the static patterns
>> represent flow?  Are the static patterns dependent on flow, or is flow
>> dependent on static patterns?  Are flow and static patterns dependent?
>>
>> I am not getting on your case and I did ask you for your opinion,
>> which I value.  I am just asking questions that I find interesting to
>> further explore.  I do not have the answers.
>>
>>
>> I am sorry I missed the whole Intellectual Level Brew-haha, it must
>> have been interesting.  Someday I will visit the archives on that one.
>> Usually when there is tension in a dialectic it is interesting to see
>> how it plays out.  Sounds a bit unfinished to me, or else the
>> combatants were unwilling to see what could be learned.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>