[MF] MOQ and theism
Muzikhed at aol.com
Muzikhed at aol.com
Fri Dec 23 11:42:32 PST 2005
M Hettinger wrote:
So,while it is probably correct to say that Dynamic Quality has no
personality, it feels equally wrong to say that DQ "has no
personality," since the sum total of whatever it is that is left in
its wake now always includes personality-ness or personality
creation. And DQ did/does lead.
------------
I'll add:
Interesting discussion... can you define personality? Would you say that
the "whatever it is that is left in the wake" of DQ would be Static Quality?
And that we can recognize some features we identify with personality with
these static(stable) patterns? I'm thinking, for example that evolution might
create different types of life on the bio level on different planets. Would we
say the planets have different personalities? Obviously we see different
cultures having different value systems, would we call these "personalities."?
Different human individuals each have unique personalities by definition.
What is this personality but the recognizably stable/static patterns of a
person's behavior?
Still, I agree, DQ itself has no personality.
TC
More information about the Moq_Focus
mailing list