[MF] MOQ: valuable or not?

[Marty Jorgensen]

Matt said:
I can only imagine that "God is Love" is as philosophically meaningful as 
"Quality is undefined."

I say:

It still doesn't answer my question, it just poses another one.  Does that
mean you believe there is no answer?  

Also, there's a little linguistic issue there.  In "God is Love", it looks
like God is said to be equivalent to Love.  "Quality is undefined" doesn't
say that Quality is EQUAL to the undefined.

Marty J

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_focus-bounces at moqtalk.org [mailto:moq_focus-bounces at moqtalk.org]
On Behalf Of Matt Kundert
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 1:13 PM
To: moq_focus at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MF] MOQ: valuable or not?

Marty,

Marty said:
What does "God is Love" mean, in a philosophical sense?  I've always 
believed that if you want to make a claim, philosophically speaking, your 
terms need to be well defined.  It may mean something to someone in a 
conversational sense, but "God is Love" is very ambiguous at best; BOTH 
those terms have so many meanings that the phrase, in a philosophical sense,

is meaningless.

Matt:
I can only imagine that "God is Love" is as philosophically meaningful as 
"Quality is undefined."

Matt

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to 
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

_______________________________________________
moq_focus mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_focus-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_focus-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_focus_archive/