[MF] MOQ: valuable or not?
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Wed Mar 8 05:24:42 PST 2006
"These books were biography. He'd read quite a bit of James'
philosophy. Now he wanted to get into some of his biography to put
some perspective on it.
He wanted particularly to see how much actual evidence there was for
the statement that James' whole purpose was to 'unite science and
religion.' That claim had turned him against James years ago, and he
didn't like it any better now. When you start out with an axe like
that to grind, it's almost guaranteed that you will conclude with
something false. The statement seemed more like some
philosophological simplification written by someone with a weak
understanding of what philosophy is for. To put philosophy in the
service of any social organization or any dogma is <immoral>
(emphasis mine). It's a lower form of evolution trying to devour a higher one."
(LILA,Chapter 29)
More information about the Moq_Focus
mailing list